IEEPA Managed Recovery Program

Recent rulings created a significant recovery opportunity with respect to challenged IEEPA tariff collections. The practical burden now falls on affected stakeholders to identify entries, assemble the record, and navigate the administrative pathway to recovery.

For many importers, the hardest part is not claiming the refund. It is receiving and administering it without triggering downstream disputes, payment errors, or control failures.

Entry and tariff identification
Liquidation and reliquidation tracking
Refund allocation & payment administration

IEEPA Managed Recovery Services provides the end-to-end administrative capacity to ensure your business doesn't leave millions on the table due to procedural bottlenecks.

Executive trade-operations administration

Select Your Recovery Profile

The recovery pathway changes based on your position in the supply chain.

I am the Importer of Record

You paid the duties to CBP directly but face risks with downstream allocation, ACE data reconciliation, and defending the methodology.

View Importer Roadmap →

I am a Consignee / Downstream Party

You absorbed the economic burden through landed costs or chargebacks, but you don't control the ACE entry data.

View Consignee Roadmap →

The Importer's Dilemma

Why Importers of Record should not manage this alone

For many businesses, the refund does not end with recovering money from the government. It begins with the harder question: who is actually entitled to that money once it arrives.

In many supply chains, the Importer of Record made the customs entry, but downstream consignees, customers, affiliates, or commercial counterparties may have absorbed all or part of the tariff burden through pricing, reimbursements, chargebacks, or contract structure.

An importer that attempts to manage this process informally faces material exposure. It may under-distribute funds to parties with legitimate claims, over-distribute funds without sufficient support, rely on incomplete broker data, miss statutory deadlines, or create avoidable disputes with key commercial partners. Even where the importer believes it knows who bore the cost, that conclusion must often be supported with a repeatable, documented methodology.

Consignee Exposure

For consignees and downstream parties: quantify the burden and document the claim

In many transactions, the party listed as Importer of Record was not the party that ultimately bore the economic cost of the tariff. Consignees, distributors, customers, and other downstream parties may have funded or absorbed those amounts through landed-cost pricing, reimbursements, post-entry adjustments, contractual pass-throughs, or related commercial arrangements.

Those parties often face a practical problem: they do not control the customs entry and they do not possess the full broker file. Where the government-facing filing path runs through the importer of record or its authorized broker, downstream parties still need a disciplined process to quantify tariff burden, support allocation, and document entitlement. We help economically affected parties assemble the documentary record necessary to trace the tariff burden to specific entries and prepare structured demands or allocation proposals.

CBP Refund Process

How the CBP refund process is expected to work

CBP has stated that IEEPA refunds are expected to run through a new ACE-based capability called CAPE, designed specifically to handle high-volume IEEPA refund requests. The expected workflow is not simply a refund request followed by payment. It is a staged process involving declaration submission, automated validations, recalculation of duties without the IEEPA component, liquidation or reliquidation, interest calculation, refund certification, and electronic disbursement.

Step 1: Submission through ACE

CBP says the entry point will be a web-based Claim Portal inside ACE. Importers and brokers will be able to submit a CAPE declaration by uploading a CSV file listing the entry summaries for which IEEPA refunds are requested. CBP also says filers will not use ABI for this process.

Step 2: File-level validation

After submission, ACE is expected to run file-level validations to confirm that required information is present, formatting is correct, the CSV is not corrupted, and the filer is either the importer of record or the authorized broker that filed on the importer’s behalf. If the submission fails at this stage, ACE will reject it and identify the errors for correction and resubmission.

Step 3: Entry-level screening

If the declaration passes file validation, ACE is expected to validate the entries one by one. CBP says the system will check, for example, that the entry number exists in ACE and that at least one IEEPA Chapter 99 provision was declared on that entry. Entries that fail these checks may be removed from the declaration while the remaining entries continue forward.

Step 4: Duty recalculation without IEEPA

CBP states that the CAPE Mass Processing component will remove the applicable IEEPA HTS numbers from validated entries and then run ACE duty-calculation checks using the ordinary ACE entry-summary process. In effect, the system is expected to recalculate the duty owed without the IEEPA duties, which forms the basis for the refund and associated interest.

Step 5: Review, liquidation, and reliquidation

CBP says accepted CAPE declarations will then move into a review and liquidation or reliquidation stage. The system is expected to schedule the affected entries for liquidation or reliquidation a specified number of days after acceptance, allow time for manual review where needed, update the underlying entry summaries to reflect the new duty totals, and automatically calculate interest. CBP also says this CAPE processing is expected to run Monday through Thursday each week.

Step 6: Refund routing and payment

Once the accepted entries reach their scheduled liquidation or reliquidation date, ACE is expected to direct them into a CAPE-specific refund process inside the ACE Collections refunds module. CBP says refunds will be consolidated by liquidation or reliquidation date and by importer of record, or by a party designated by the importer on CBP Form 4811, and then sent electronically to the designated bank account.

What this process does not mean

A government portal does not eliminate the need for claim preparation. The CAPE workflow still depends on accurate entry identification, clean submission files, correct importer or broker authorization, valid Chapter 99 linkage, and the ability to resolve rejected entries and exception cases. CBP has also said the first phase of CAPE is expected to cover the majority of formal and informal entries, but not every scenario, including certain AD/CVD-affected entries, entries with liquidation statuses such as 'Suspended,' 'Extended,' or 'Under Review,' and certain other entry types such as warehouse withdrawals and drawback-designated entries.

Even under CBP’s planned streamlined model, the work does not begin and end with uploading a list of entries. Businesses still need to identify affected entries, isolate IEEPA duties from other duty components, resolve rejected or excluded entries, prepare for liquidation and reliquidation timing, confirm who should receive the refund, and make sure electronic refund instructions are actually in place.

Who files the refund request?

CBP says the CAPE filing path is for the importer of record or the authorized broker that filed the entry summary on the importer’s behalf.

Will every entry be processed in phase one?

No. CBP says the initial phase is expected to cover the majority of entries, but not all scenarios.

Will refunds be mailed?

CBP says CAPE refunds are expected to be sent electronically to the designated bank account.

Get a Recovery Assessment

Why Recovery Breaks Down in Practice

What can go wrong without a managed recovery process

Refund programs of this scale often fail for operational reasons, not legal reasons. In the CAPE environment, incomplete or incorrectly structured submissions do not merely slow the claim; they can produce rejected declarations, stripped-out entries, and serial resubmission cycles. Common breakdowns include:

Affected entries are never fully identified because broker data is incomplete or fragmented across systems.
Tariff amounts are miscalculated because standard duties and challenged duties were commingled on the same entries.
Liquidation and protest deadlines pass while teams are still collecting records.
Electronic payment profiles are not properly established, delaying or rejecting disbursement.
The Importer of Record receives funds but lacks a documented allocation methodology for downstream parties.

Consignees and customers challenge the importer’s position after funds are received.
Stakeholders rely on spreadsheet logic that cannot be audited or reproduced months later.
Related entities, brokers, or operating divisions submit inconsistent information.
Refund distributions are made before adequate releases or acknowledgments are in place.
Management later discovers that the company cannot explain, entry by entry, how recovered amounts were determined.

This is not a spreadsheet exercise.

Businesses confronting IEEPA refund opportunities are often dealing with thousands of entries, multiple brokers, overlapping stakeholders, and high-dollar commercial consequences. A CSV upload may be the intake format. It is not the recovery process. The actual work lies in preparing a defensible declaration, surviving validation, isolating the IEEPA component, managing exceptions, and administering the recovery after the government-side workflow is complete. IEEPA Managed Recovery Services replaces ad hoc processing with controlled administration. Our role is to bring repeatability and operational soundness to a process that is highly vulnerable to human error.

Get a Recovery Assessment

Forensic Identification

Why tariff identification dictates a structured review

IEEPA duties were frequently reported alongside ordinary customs duties and other Chapter 99 measures on the exact same entry lines. Identifying the recoverable component requires isolating multiple shifting variables.

Country of Origin

Country-specific measures trigger materially different tariff treatment. Jurisdictions like China, Brazil, Canada, and India command rates substantially different from the general baseline.

Date of Entry

Applicable tariff treatment pivots exactly on when the entry was made. Various IEEPA measures were imposed, increased, paused, reduced, reinstated, or modified precisely by date.

Product Scope

Specific products were excepted or treated differently. Semiconductor exceptions and agricultural modifications dictate whether IEEPA duties actually applied to the entry.

Tariff Stacking

IEEPA duties frequently appear alongside Section 232, 301, 201, or AD/CVD obligations. Mapping that interaction is mandatory to determine the true refundable amount.

The Managed Framework

What the program is built to administer

The program is built around the practical mechanics of customs administration and refund delivery, rather than around a single filing event.

1

Intake and data collection

We gather the available customs and commercial data necessary to begin analysis, which may include entry summaries, broker data, HTSUS classifications, Chapter 99 duty information, payment records, invoices, and related supply-chain documentation.

2

Identification of affected entries

We identify entries that may have included IEEPA duties and analyze the extent to which those duties were deposited, paid, liquidated, or remain subject to further administrative action. This includes attention to liquidation posture and timing constraints reflected in the customs process.

3

Forensic tariff reconstruction

Where entry reporting is not cleanly separated, we perform a forensic reconstruction of the duties associated with the relevant merchandise so the IEEPA component can be isolated from other duties, fees, or trade remedies. Authorities have indicated that this separation is not always obvious from the entry-summary records alone.

4

Payer and beneficiary analysis

We analyze who actually bore the economic burden of the tariffs. In some situations, the importer of record may not be the party that ultimately funded or absorbed the tariff cost. The program is designed to help document those relationships and support an orderly refund allocation process.

5

Recovery administration

We coordinate the ACE/CAPE recovery workflow, including preparation of declaration-ready entry schedules, CSV-based submission support for the importer of record or authorized broker, response to file and entry validation issues, and management of the supporting record required for reconciliation, liquidation or reliquidation, and refund administration.

6

Release and payment coordination

Where multiple stakeholders may assert entitlement to the same economic recovery, we help coordinate a documented process for releases, acknowledgments, allocation support, and downstream or upstream payment administration.

7

Audit-ready closeout

We maintain a supportable recovery file designed to assist internal controls, post-refund review, auditor questions, stakeholder disputes, and any later governmental inquiry concerning the basis for recovery and distribution.

Governance

Recovery is only half the job. Allocation and distribution are where risk concentrates.

For many importers, the most sensitive phase begins after the refund is approved. Funds may need to be evaluated, allocated, and in some cases distributed among multiple stakeholders that participated in the original transaction chain.

ACE / CAPE Declaration

CBP Review, Liquidation / Reliquidation, & Refund

Importer of Record or Form 4811 Designee

Managed Allocation / Distribution Administration

Consignees, Customers, Affiliates & Counterparties

The recovery challenge is not merely obtaining funds from the government. It is administering a documented pathway from disbursement to supportable allocation.

That process can implicate customers, consignees, affiliates, manufacturers, procurement entities, and other commercial counterparties.

We help clients build a repeatable allocation framework supported by entry-level data, commercial records, and payment logic that can be consistently applied across a large population of claims.

Where appropriate, we also help coordinate organized communications, supporting schedules, and release workflows so that distributions are made with clarity and documented support.

A recovery that is poorly administered after receipt can create more commercial friction than the tariff itself. Our program is designed to help clients avoid that outcome.

Data gathering is not administrative housekeeping. It is the foundation of the claim.

Most businesses do not maintain a single, complete, litigation-ready dataset of historical tariff payments.

The information is typically dispersed across customs brokers, ACE exports, ABI reports, finance systems, landed-cost schedules, vendor files, spreadsheets, and email chains. Records may vary in format, terminology, and completeness from one broker or time period to the next.

Our team coordinates the collection, normalization, and reconciliation of these records at scale. We work to identify missing entry support, inconsistent duty coding, conflicting commercial records, and gaps that could undermine a later declaration, protest, allocation, or demand. By the time the claim moves forward, the data should not merely exist. It should be organized, explainable, and capable of surviving scrutiny.

Qualified counsel where needed

IEEPA Managed Recovery Services is built on the understanding that many recoveries will turn on administration, data, timing, and operational coordination.

However, where formal protests, litigation strategy, or legal interpretation are required, we seamlessly coordinate with qualified legal counsel. Our role is to ensure that counsel is supported by a well-organized, audit-ready administrative record rather than fragmented customs data, inconsistent stakeholder communications, and improvised calculations.

This division of labor ensures that your legal team can focus on the law, while we focus on the data and administration.

Defensibility

Built for audit protection and supportable recovery administration

A recovery process of this scale should not end with receipt of funds. It should leave behind a reliable record.

In a recovery environment involving large sums, multiple stakeholders, and evolving federal procedures, the question is not simply whether a claim can be submitted. The question is whether the methodology behind that claim can be defended later. The program is designed to help clients maintain an operationally sound file that may include:

Source entry and tariff data
Reconciliation workpapers
Duty-isolation methodology
Economic-burden analysis

Supporting commercial records
Release and allocation records
Payment administration logs
Exception handling history

That record can matter not only for internal accounting and controls, but also for later disputes among stakeholders, questions from lenders or auditors, and any subsequent governmental review.

Who we serve

The program is designed for businesses and stakeholders involved in the customs entry, payment, and downstream economic burden of IEEPA tariffs.

Importers of record

Entities responsible for entry and customs-facing administration that need structured support in identifying, validating, and recovering affected duties.

Small and midsize businesses

Businesses without internal customs, legal, or recovery teams capable of managing a large-scale refund administration project.

Consignees

Parties that may not have been the importer of record, but may have borne the commercial cost of the tariffs and need a process for documenting entitlement.

Customs brokers

Brokers supporting clients with entry records, data extraction, classification context, and administrative coordination.

Manufacturers and distributors

Recovery support for businesses affected by tariff costs across procurement, supply-chain, and commercial distribution arrangements.

Enterprise groups

A coordinated framework for clients with complex structures, multiple importing entities, large data sets, or cross-affiliate exposure.

Begin with a recovery assessment

If your business may have paid IEEPA tariffs, the first step is to determine what entries are affected, what duties were actually paid, what the current administrative posture may be, and who may be entitled to recovered amounts.

Who engages the program:

Importers of Record that need a controlled process for identifying, claiming, allocating, and distributing recoveries.
Consignees and downstream parties seeking to quantify tariff burden and prepare structured demands.
Customs brokers looking for a trusted administrative partner to support high-volume client recoveries.
Corporate groups with multiple entities, multiple brokers, and fragmented historical data.
Businesses anticipating disputes over economic burden or post-recovery allocation.

Confidential Assessment

Company Name *

Contact Name *

Email Address *

Phone Number *

Estimated IEEPA Tariffs Paid

Primary Customs Broker(s)

I confirm that I represent a stakeholder seeking to evaluate recovery administration.

Let us handle the administration. You handle your business.

Do not let procedural bottlenecks stand between your company and its capital. IEEPA Managed Recovery Services is designed to help businesses approach that process with structure, discipline, and audit-ready administration.

Request Assessment Contact Us

The legal result is only the beginning. Recovery now turns on claims administration.