CBP Refund Process

CAPE is the process CBP is building now.

CBP has stated that IEEPA refunds are expected to be administered through a new ACE capability called CAPE — the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries. That process is expected to run through four connected stages: Claim Portal, Mass Processing, Review and Liquidation/Reliquidation, and Refund. The work for affected businesses is no longer simply identifying whether tariffs were paid. It is preparing a claim that can move through that system cleanly, survive validation, and result in a supportable refund.

For many businesses, the operational burden will not be filing a single request. It will be building the entry population, validating filer authority, isolating IEEPA duties from other duty components, resolving rejected entries, preparing for phase-one limitations, and making sure the refund is routed to the correct recipient with the right downstream administration behind it.

Request CAPE Assessment See How CAPE Works

A CSV upload may be the intake format. It is not the recovery process.

CBP’s description of CAPE makes clear that the system is expected to validate the filing, screen entries individually, recalculate duties without the IEEPA component, move accepted entries into liquidation or reliquidation, calculate interest, and then route refunds electronically. The real work lies in preparing a clean declaration and managing what happens when the system removes entries, flags errors, or encounters scenarios that phase one does not yet cover.

ACE / CAPE

What CAPE is and why this page matters

CBP says CAPE is a new capability being built inside ACE, CBP’s system of record for imported merchandise, to calculate and provide valid refunds of IEEPA duties. ACE is already the platform through which entry summaries are processed, duties are assessed, liquidations occur, and refunds are administered electronically. That matters because the IEEPA recovery path is expected to run through the same customs system of record, not through an external workaround.

CBP’s earlier declaration also explains why this is happening inside ACE at all. It said the agency faced more than 53 million entries with IEEPA duties, about $166 billion in IEEPA collections, and a refund process that would otherwise require millions of hours if handled manually. CAPE is the operational answer to that scale problem.

Claim Portal

The web-based entry point where the importer of record or authorized broker submits the CAPE Declaration through ACE. CBP says this will be a new tab in importer and broker ACE Portal accounts, and not an ABI filing path.

Mass Processing

The system stage where ACE removes applicable IEEPA HTS numbers from validated entries, reruns duty calculations, and computes the duty outcome as if the IEEPA duties had never been declared.

Review and Liquidation

The stage where accepted entries are set for liquidation or reliquidation, updated to reflect new duty totals, and processed with interest, with room for agency review where needed. CBP says this CAPE processing is expected to run Monday through Thursday.

Refund

The stage where ACE routes accepted entries into a CAPE-specific refund process, consolidates refunds by liquidation or reliquidation date and by importer of record or Form 4811 designee, and sends the funds electronically to the designated bank account.

Process Map

How the CAPE refund workflow is expected to operate

1

Build the CAPE Declaration

CBP says the filer will upload a CSV file listing the entry summaries for which IEEPA refunds are requested. The filer must be the importer of record for the listed entries or the authorized broker that filed those entry summaries on the importer’s behalf.

2

Pass file-level validation

ACE is expected to check whether required information is present, whether the formatting is correct, whether the filer has proper standing, and whether the CSV itself is valid. If the file fails this validation series, ACE will reject the submission and identify the errors for correction and resubmission.

3

Pass entry-level validation

If the file passes, ACE is expected to screen entries one by one. CBP says the system will confirm, for example, that the entry number exists in ACE and that at least one IEEPA Chapter 99 number was declared on that entry. Entries that fail can be removed from the declaration while the remaining entries continue forward.

4

Recalculate duty without IEEPA

Once validated, the CAPE Mass Processing component is expected to remove the IEEPA HTS numbers and run ACE’s ordinary duty-calculation validations. CBP says the system will then calculate duties as if the IEEPA duties had never been declared.

5

Liquidation or reliquidation

CBP says accepted CAPE declarations will then move into review and liquidation or reliquidation. Entries are expected to be set for processing a specified number of days from acceptance, allowing for agency review where necessary. The system is expected to update the entry summaries, calculate interest, and process CAPE liquidations or reliquidations during the week.

6

Route refunds electronically

When accepted entries reach the scheduled liquidation or reliquidation date, ACE is expected to direct them into a CAPE-specific refund process within the ACE Collections refunds module. Refunds are expected to be consolidated by liquidation or reliquidation date and by importer of record, or a party designated by the importer on CBP Form 4811, then certified for electronic disbursement to the designated bank account.

Failure Points

Where claims break down before money moves

A defined government portal does not eliminate execution risk. Recoveries can still fail or face severe delays at multiple points in the CAPE workflow.

Invalid filer posture

A claim can fail before it begins if the filer is not the importer of record for the listed entries or the authorized broker that filed on the importer’s behalf.

Rejected file structure

CBP says ACE will reject submissions that are incomplete, improperly formatted, or corrupted. In practice, that means claim preparation has to be disciplined before upload.

Entries stripped

Even if the file passes, entries may still be removed during entry-specific validation. A declaration can move forward with part of the population excluded, creating an exception-management problem.

Duty isolation problems

CBP’s earlier declaration explains that importers often combine multiple duty components on the same entry line. The precise IEEPA component is not always cleanly visible and may require reconstruction.

Phase-one exclusions

CBP says phase one is expected to cover the majority of formal and informal entries, but not all scenarios. The stated exclusions include unliquidated AD/CVD entries, and entries with ACE statuses such as Suspended or Extended.

Refund-routing failure

CBP refunds are electronic. Its earlier declaration says importers that have not completed the setup process for electronic refunds can still see otherwise valid refunds rejected.

Client Readiness

What still has to be done before a CAPE upload is safe

CBP’s earlier declaration said the new process will require minimal submission from importers. That is a statement about the government-facing filing format, not about the work needed to prepare the matter. Businesses still have to identify the correct entry population, confirm who can file, assemble the right data from brokers and internal systems, isolate IEEPA duties from other duty components, and prepare to address rejected entries or excluded scenarios.

This is where the IEEPA Managed Recovery Program provides the most value, ensuring each operational prerequisite is met before submission.

Confirm the correct importer-of-record population.
Confirm broker authority and portal posture.
Assemble entry-level data across brokers and systems.
Test for IEEPA Chapter 99 presence and eligibility.
Separate IEEPA duty exposure from other Chapter 99, AD/CVD, and ordinary duty components where needed.
Organize re-upload workflows for rejected or stripped entries.
Segment phase-one-eligible claims from exception claims.
Confirm refund routing and bank-account readiness.

Execution Risk

A portal does not convert this into a spreadsheet problem

CBP’s earlier declaration explains why. Entry summaries often contain multiple lines and multiple HTS provisions on the same line. IEEPA duties may sit beside ordinary duties, Section 232 or 301 duties, exclusions, or AD/CVD-related amounts. In some entries, the IEEPA amount is not cleanly stated and has to be reconstructed before the correct refund logic can be applied.

That same declaration also described a legacy environment where large-scale changes could kick out anomalous entries for separate evaluation, where some interest calculations may still require manual work, and where manual processing at the old scale would be massive. The right takeaway is not that CAPE makes administration trivial. It is that CAPE gives the process a defined rail, while leaving the preparatory and exception-handling burden very much alive.

Payment Control

Who receives the refund is only part of the answer

CBP says the CAPE Refund component will consolidate refunds by liquidation or reliquidation date and by importer of record, or by a Form 4811 designee. That makes refund routing more efficient on the government side, but it does not answer the downstream business questions that often arise after the money lands.

Recovery administration does not end at disbursement. Businesses may still need allocation support, consignee or affiliate analysis, internal payment controls, release workflows, and an audit-ready record explaining how recovered amounts were handled after receipt. That second-stage administration is one of the most important reasons to use a managed platform.

Phase one is expected to cover most claims, not every claim

CBP says CAPE is expected to launch in phases. In the first phase, it expects to process the majority of formal and informal entries on which IEEPA duties were paid, but not certain more complicated scenarios, including unliquidated AD/CVD entries, entries with specified ACE liquidation statuses, and certain other entry types. This is exactly why claim segmentation and exception management should be part of your recovery strategy.

CAPE Readiness

Do not wait to discover what ACE rejects.

If your business may have paid IEEPA duties, the work now is to prepare for the CAPE process as it is actually being described: declaration-ready entry files, validation-ready data, phase-one claim segmentation, refund-routing readiness, and a supportable administrative record from submission through payment.

Request CAPE Readiness Review Begin Managed Intake